Chris Sununu Maintains GOP Extends Beyond Donald Trump
The four-term governor of New Hampshire shares insights on the current state of the Republican Party and reflects on his future plans as he prepares to depart from office.
TroibNews 
Donald Trump reshaped the Republican Party to reflect his own persona, but Chris Sununu believes this transformation may not endure.
The outgoing Republican governor of New Hampshire, who often vacillates between supporting and criticizing Trump, maintains that the party has a broader foundation than either its prominent figure or the movement he ignited.
“Trump is extremely unique. There's no ‘Trump lite’ or ‘Trump 2.0’ that can replace or replicate what he's brought to the table, for better or for worse,” Sununu stated during an interview.
He argues that the GOP retains its status as a “big tent,” highlighting diverse groups like the Log Cabin Republicans, fiscal conservatives, libertarian-leaners, and social conservatives.
For Sununu, this assertion is vital, particularly if he hopes to have a political career beyond commentary. As a member of a well-established New Hampshire political family whose more traditional Republican values have been overshadowed by hard-liners in the Trump era, he has been reelected three times and consistently ranks among the most popular governors in the nation, even when he diverges from the Trump-centric direction of his party.
However, Sununu, who chose not to pursue a fifth term, has a mixed record in guiding similar-minded candidates within a MAGA-dominated GOP. This year alone, he successfully endorsed former Sen. Kelly Ayotte as his replacement but could not secure victory for former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley in New Hampshire’s Republican presidential primary. Should he aim for higher office, he lacks a clear supporter base outside New England.
At 50 years old, Sununu previously declined a Senate campaign in 2022 and a presidential run in 2024. He claims he is not considering either position in the immediate future and expresses a desire to transition back to the private sector to “make some money.”
As he prepares to leave the governorship after eight years, Sununu discussed his initiatives to combat opioid overdose deaths, his plans for future political involvement, his consistent skepticism toward legalizing recreational marijuana, and his belief that Trump does not have as firm a grip on the GOP as it appears.
This conversation has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.
What would you say is your biggest policy achievement as governor?
When I first ran for governor, the two big issues facing the state were obviously the opioid epidemic and the mental health crisis. And we just jumped right in. We really focused on rural access to care and reinvented recovery-friendly workplace programs. It was really about opening up access.
Trump has talked a lot about trying to stop the flow of fentanyl, an opioid, over the southern border. Do you think the policies he’s proposing can help do that?
The No. 1 problem with the fentanyl crisis is the open border. Closing up the border definitely makes it harder for that stuff to come in.
How do you want to see Trump and Republicans in Congress tackle the border? There was a plan on the table last year…
That plan was terrible. The key to all of this is closing the border, but making the ports of entry much more robust to handle the number of people who may want to come across in a legal and authorized and processed way. And, most importantly, the “Remain in Mexico” policy has to be reinstated. Aside from closing the illegal crossings at the border, you need to have immigration reform that deals with creating a more modernized pathway for folks to become citizens the right way.
Trump’s plans for larger-scale deportations, do you think that’s the right way to go?
Specifically for criminals, yes. These are the first folks that should absolutely be deported. Beyond that Congress and the president can kind of tackle the next phase, but I think it does have to be broken in phases.
Back to New Hampshire for a minute. I want to talk about cannabis. You’ve largely been a skeptic of legalizing recreational marijuana, which failed again this year in the state Legislature. Why should New Hampshire miss out on tax revenues from this when all the surrounding states provide access to it?
You should never legalize drugs for the money. That's awful. If you're legalizing marijuana because you need more money, then you have a horribly malfunctioning state. So there's an ethics and a health issue here. I can tell you virtually every one of the governors [in the surrounding New England states] has indicated to me various problems with the legalization of marijuana, whether it's the exacerbated mental health issues, whether it's the black market that it fundamentally creates, whether it's the advertising problems, the proximity to schools that creates a lot of problems for parents. There's so many reasons not to do it. If you were going to do it here, [you would need to do so in a] responsible and controlled way that keeps it away from kids and allows the state to control the marketing messaging. I was semi-open to it if it could be controlled in the right way.
Before the election, we spoke about abortion and how Democrats were running hard on the issue in New Hampshire. You said the issue was losing salience and that voters were more concerned with the economy. The Republican won the governor’s race, so what is your assessment now?
In 2022, Roe v. Wade had just happened; it was much more of an unknown issue. This time around, two more years have passed. People in New Hampshire — no one’s denied an abortion, no one’s denied their rights [the state restricts abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions]. So the fearmongering hasn’t borne true. There are some individual states and places that are more restrictive or less restrictive, but that’s up to voters [in those states] to decide. It’ll still be an issue, but it's just not going to be the political backbreaker issue that the Democrats want it to be.
Do you think that there's still room within the Republican Party for criticism of Trump when warranted?
Of course there is. Did [former Rep.] Matt Gaetz just get pushed right out of his nomination to be the U.S. attorney general? Yes. Look, it's never easy criticizing the president and the standard bearer of your party, and there's always that kind of political honeymoon period that happens when you first get elected. But there are already signs of folks that are willing to push back and criticize and say no when they feel like they have to say no. And that should give the American people a big sigh of relief that it’s not the evil dictatorship that the liberal media was telling us it was going to be.
Trump is term-limited. So that opens up the question of what happens in 2028. Do you think Vice President-elect and Ohio Sen. JD Vance has a lock on the nomination in ‘28? Or do you think there will be a real, contested primary?
There’ll definitely be a real, contested primary. I think JD is great, by the way. He's shown himself to have overcome a lot of the early criticisms that he [faced]. He's competent. He's incredibly smart on his feet. He knows the issues. He's very cordial. He gets along with the other side — that was shown through the vice presidential debate, and I think that gave strength to the entire ticket. So there's no doubt he's in a great position if he wanted to run in ‘28. But no one's going to just hand it to him. You’ve got to bring him through his paces. I imagine if he wanted to be a front-runner, he would be. But no, you're gonna have a lot of folks from all walks of life running.
You know I’m going to ask if you’re thinking about it.
No. Not for ’28, I’m definitely not thinking about it.
So are you ruling out a presidential run in 2028?
I don't rule anything out, but there's no story there. It’s literally zero on my list in terms of thinking about anything. I can't see myself running in 2028. That would be, holy cow, that would be a real change of my plans. I don't see any path to that actually happening. I'm excited to go back to the private sector.
So what are your plans? What’s next for you?
I’m going to enter the private sector and make some money, do some business-type stuff, but I'll also be in the media a bit. I have some ideas to keep myself kind of scratching the political itch through various venues in the media and content creation around smart political content.
You’ve been making a push to support Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s plans for the “Department of Government Efficiency.” Tell me how that can work.
You can really look to the states to get ideas. Musk has to use — even though he’s an outsider, he has political capital — he needs to use it and make sure he’s not just putting a list of good ideas in front of Congress, a Republican Congress that is typically tepid about actually doing anything substantive. Congress just can’t help themselves about overspending, Republicans included. So he and Trump could use their combined political capital to ensure that whatever they do is lasting. It would be a huge legacy initiative for them. You gotta really push Congress to dig in for a balanced budget of some sort. Ultimately, they're going to have to start talking about entitlement reforms or Social Security reforms that just have to come because we have the bills coming due.
Trump wants to end daylight saving time. You said in a recent op-ed that you support that. But the current push in Congress is to make daylight saving time permanent. What’s your thinking on that?
I don't care whether you make it permanent or you get rid of it, but let's stop changing the clock, right? That's my point. I don't care. Pick an hour. You get the exact same thing, whether you make it permanent or get rid [of it]. The whole point is, let's stop changing the clock.
Jessica Kline contributed to this report for TROIB News
The outgoing Republican governor of New Hampshire, who often vacillates between supporting and criticizing Trump, maintains that the party has a broader foundation than either its prominent figure or the movement he ignited.
“Trump is extremely unique. There's no ‘Trump lite’ or ‘Trump 2.0’ that can replace or replicate what he's brought to the table, for better or for worse,” Sununu stated during an interview.
He argues that the GOP retains its status as a “big tent,” highlighting diverse groups like the Log Cabin Republicans, fiscal conservatives, libertarian-leaners, and social conservatives.
For Sununu, this assertion is vital, particularly if he hopes to have a political career beyond commentary. As a member of a well-established New Hampshire political family whose more traditional Republican values have been overshadowed by hard-liners in the Trump era, he has been reelected three times and consistently ranks among the most popular governors in the nation, even when he diverges from the Trump-centric direction of his party.
However, Sununu, who chose not to pursue a fifth term, has a mixed record in guiding similar-minded candidates within a MAGA-dominated GOP. This year alone, he successfully endorsed former Sen. Kelly Ayotte as his replacement but could not secure victory for former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley in New Hampshire’s Republican presidential primary. Should he aim for higher office, he lacks a clear supporter base outside New England.
At 50 years old, Sununu previously declined a Senate campaign in 2022 and a presidential run in 2024. He claims he is not considering either position in the immediate future and expresses a desire to transition back to the private sector to “make some money.”
As he prepares to leave the governorship after eight years, Sununu discussed his initiatives to combat opioid overdose deaths, his plans for future political involvement, his consistent skepticism toward legalizing recreational marijuana, and his belief that Trump does not have as firm a grip on the GOP as it appears.
This conversation has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.
What would you say is your biggest policy achievement as governor?
When I first ran for governor, the two big issues facing the state were obviously the opioid epidemic and the mental health crisis. And we just jumped right in. We really focused on rural access to care and reinvented recovery-friendly workplace programs. It was really about opening up access.
Trump has talked a lot about trying to stop the flow of fentanyl, an opioid, over the southern border. Do you think the policies he’s proposing can help do that?
The No. 1 problem with the fentanyl crisis is the open border. Closing up the border definitely makes it harder for that stuff to come in.
How do you want to see Trump and Republicans in Congress tackle the border? There was a plan on the table last year…
That plan was terrible. The key to all of this is closing the border, but making the ports of entry much more robust to handle the number of people who may want to come across in a legal and authorized and processed way. And, most importantly, the “Remain in Mexico” policy has to be reinstated. Aside from closing the illegal crossings at the border, you need to have immigration reform that deals with creating a more modernized pathway for folks to become citizens the right way.
Trump’s plans for larger-scale deportations, do you think that’s the right way to go?
Specifically for criminals, yes. These are the first folks that should absolutely be deported. Beyond that Congress and the president can kind of tackle the next phase, but I think it does have to be broken in phases.
Back to New Hampshire for a minute. I want to talk about cannabis. You’ve largely been a skeptic of legalizing recreational marijuana, which failed again this year in the state Legislature. Why should New Hampshire miss out on tax revenues from this when all the surrounding states provide access to it?
You should never legalize drugs for the money. That's awful. If you're legalizing marijuana because you need more money, then you have a horribly malfunctioning state. So there's an ethics and a health issue here. I can tell you virtually every one of the governors [in the surrounding New England states] has indicated to me various problems with the legalization of marijuana, whether it's the exacerbated mental health issues, whether it's the black market that it fundamentally creates, whether it's the advertising problems, the proximity to schools that creates a lot of problems for parents. There's so many reasons not to do it. If you were going to do it here, [you would need to do so in a] responsible and controlled way that keeps it away from kids and allows the state to control the marketing messaging. I was semi-open to it if it could be controlled in the right way.
Before the election, we spoke about abortion and how Democrats were running hard on the issue in New Hampshire. You said the issue was losing salience and that voters were more concerned with the economy. The Republican won the governor’s race, so what is your assessment now?
In 2022, Roe v. Wade had just happened; it was much more of an unknown issue. This time around, two more years have passed. People in New Hampshire — no one’s denied an abortion, no one’s denied their rights [the state restricts abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions]. So the fearmongering hasn’t borne true. There are some individual states and places that are more restrictive or less restrictive, but that’s up to voters [in those states] to decide. It’ll still be an issue, but it's just not going to be the political backbreaker issue that the Democrats want it to be.
Do you think that there's still room within the Republican Party for criticism of Trump when warranted?
Of course there is. Did [former Rep.] Matt Gaetz just get pushed right out of his nomination to be the U.S. attorney general? Yes. Look, it's never easy criticizing the president and the standard bearer of your party, and there's always that kind of political honeymoon period that happens when you first get elected. But there are already signs of folks that are willing to push back and criticize and say no when they feel like they have to say no. And that should give the American people a big sigh of relief that it’s not the evil dictatorship that the liberal media was telling us it was going to be.
Trump is term-limited. So that opens up the question of what happens in 2028. Do you think Vice President-elect and Ohio Sen. JD Vance has a lock on the nomination in ‘28? Or do you think there will be a real, contested primary?
There’ll definitely be a real, contested primary. I think JD is great, by the way. He's shown himself to have overcome a lot of the early criticisms that he [faced]. He's competent. He's incredibly smart on his feet. He knows the issues. He's very cordial. He gets along with the other side — that was shown through the vice presidential debate, and I think that gave strength to the entire ticket. So there's no doubt he's in a great position if he wanted to run in ‘28. But no one's going to just hand it to him. You’ve got to bring him through his paces. I imagine if he wanted to be a front-runner, he would be. But no, you're gonna have a lot of folks from all walks of life running.
You know I’m going to ask if you’re thinking about it.
No. Not for ’28, I’m definitely not thinking about it.
So are you ruling out a presidential run in 2028?
I don't rule anything out, but there's no story there. It’s literally zero on my list in terms of thinking about anything. I can't see myself running in 2028. That would be, holy cow, that would be a real change of my plans. I don't see any path to that actually happening. I'm excited to go back to the private sector.
So what are your plans? What’s next for you?
I’m going to enter the private sector and make some money, do some business-type stuff, but I'll also be in the media a bit. I have some ideas to keep myself kind of scratching the political itch through various venues in the media and content creation around smart political content.
You’ve been making a push to support Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s plans for the “Department of Government Efficiency.” Tell me how that can work.
You can really look to the states to get ideas. Musk has to use — even though he’s an outsider, he has political capital — he needs to use it and make sure he’s not just putting a list of good ideas in front of Congress, a Republican Congress that is typically tepid about actually doing anything substantive. Congress just can’t help themselves about overspending, Republicans included. So he and Trump could use their combined political capital to ensure that whatever they do is lasting. It would be a huge legacy initiative for them. You gotta really push Congress to dig in for a balanced budget of some sort. Ultimately, they're going to have to start talking about entitlement reforms or Social Security reforms that just have to come because we have the bills coming due.
Trump wants to end daylight saving time. You said in a recent op-ed that you support that. But the current push in Congress is to make daylight saving time permanent. What’s your thinking on that?
I don't care whether you make it permanent or you get rid of it, but let's stop changing the clock, right? That's my point. I don't care. Pick an hour. You get the exact same thing, whether you make it permanent or get rid [of it]. The whole point is, let's stop changing the clock.
Jessica Kline contributed to this report for TROIB News
