Opinion | Donald Trump’s Attire Seemed at Odds with ‘America First’
Some members of Washington presented themselves appropriately for the inauguration, while others appeared foolish.
TroibNews 
Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 47th president of the United States showcased a MAGA movement back in power, complete with its distinct sense of style.
While some attendees at the ceremony, including those at the preceding vice presidential dinner, appeared well-groomed, others, like Sen. John Fetterman, stood out for entirely different reasons.
While there's much to say about the vibrant women's fashion on display, I chose to focus solely on the men. Here are my thoughts as a menswear writer on the sartorial highs and lows of the occasion.
**Donald Trump’s Suit and Italian Influence**
Since George Washington donned a morning coat and intricate ruffles, it's been customary for U.S. presidents to wear American-made clothing for their inaugurations. Joe Biden, for instance, chose a full Ralph Lauren ensemble, with every piece crafted in New York at Hickey Freeman’s factory. Similarly, Barack Obama wore garments from Hart Schaffner Marx, all produced in Illinois.
As of now, the maker of Donald Trump’s inauguration outfit remains undisclosed. During his previous presidency, Trump favored suits from the Italian luxury brand Brioni, known for their sharply padded shoulders — a contrast to the softer lines typical of American fashion. Based on the suit's sharp silhouette, it appears that his choice today matches the essence of Brioni. While opinions often critique Trump’s penchant for oversized clothing, this particular cut is flattering, enhancing his V-shaped silhouette. Notably, he opted for a tie with a blue-and-red design, possibly signaling a desire for bipartisanship.
Despite the suit's Italian flair, I hope Trump chose an American manufacturer. The closing of American factories over recent years is concerning. Keeping with the tradition of wearing American-made attire would be a positive gesture for a sitting president, not just during inaugurations but throughout their administration.
**JD Vance’s Almost Perfect Look**
The vice presidential dinner showcased more of the administration's fashion sensibilities. JD Vance donned a single-breasted dinner suit, complete with black onyx dress studs and a bow tie, likely tailored by Romualdo Pelle, a seasoned Italian craftsman in Ohio. The fit was commendable, as the jacket complemented his physique without strain. However, the sleeves were a bit too narrow, causing them to ride up and expose too much shirt cuff, an issue that can easily be remedied by letting the arms hang relaxed when fitting a jacket. Notably, Vance wore formal pumps, a bold choice that, while less common nowadays, remains a classic and sophisticated option for black-tie events.
**Biden’s Sneakers Break the Classic Look**
In the past decade, Joe Biden has generally been well-dressed for a political figure, managing to sidestep many of the worse trends thanks to his age. He sticks to a classic silhouette that flatters his frame, avoiding the shrunken tailoring that has plagued many.
For Trump’s inauguration, Biden wore his standard navy suit paired with a dark tie and a white spread-collar shirt, complete with French cuffs, which added a touch of formality. However, his choice of black-soled dress sneakers, presumably for comfort, detracted from the overall elegance of the ensemble. A pair of leather-soled oxford shoes would have been more fitting.
**John Fetterman’s Casual Approach**
Despite icy temperatures in Washington, Fetterman arrived at the formal events wearing a black hoodie, basketball shorts, and rubber running shoes. This laid-back attire has often garnered more attention than his legislative work. It raises questions as to why Fetterman could wear a suit for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address, yet appeared so casually dressed for this significant occasion. In the new year, it might benefit him to invest in a well-fitting custom suit, preferably a dark worsted fabric.
**Ted Cruz and the Casual Watch Misstep**
Traditionally, men distinguished their wardrobes between casual and formal, a standard that seems to have faded. This was evident in Ted Cruz’s attire at the ceremony, where he opted for a navy suit, light blue shirt, and a chunky Hublot chronograph on a rubber strap. The watch, while expensive, clashed with the formality of the suit. A more understated timepiece would have enhanced the overall elegance of his look.
**Vivek Ramaswamy’s Outdated Fit**
Vivek Ramaswamy’s slim-fit suit struck a nostalgic note, reminiscent of early 2000s fashion. His trousers were tight to the point of discomfort, barely covering his rear. A suitable investment in quality tailoring would serve him well, ensuring he projects a more polished image.
**A Call for Tailoring Among Elites**
This year’s inauguration resembled the finalé of a sitcom, with various familiar figures from the celebrity world making appearances. Notable among them were MMA fighter Conor McGregor in a snug plum suit, which looked overly restrained. Joe Rogan’s somber ensemble echoed a funeral vibe, while influencers like the Paul brothers braved the cold in charcoal attire.
The tech sector's representation was particularly telling, with CEOs like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos in attendance. Musk’s choice of what appeared to be a Tom Ford suit was commendable compared to his previous looks, but the overall lack of well-tailored suits among these elites signifies a growing discomfort with traditional menswear in an era leaning towards casual styles.As the day unfolded, the fashion choices reflected not only individual styles but also the broader cultural attitudes among a new generation of leaders and influencers. The juxtaposition of familiar figures dressed in a mix of formal and casual attire pointed to a shifting landscape in American political and social spheres, where tradition competes with evolving norms of self-expression and comfort.
**Fashion Trends Mirroring Political Discourse**
The sartorial choices at the inauguration ceremony and associated events can also be seen as a reflection of contemporary political discourse. The casual attire worn by some figures symbolizes a break from established norms, presenting an image that is accessible and relatable to a base that values authenticity over tradition. In this context, Fetterman's laid-back approach resonates with a demographic that appreciates the unfiltered, while Cruz’s more conventional look could be seen as catering to a different voter segment that clings to established political fashion.
Moreover, the focus on tailoring—highlighted through Vance's almost flawless suit that was just slightly off in sleeve fit—underscores the importance of personal presentation in politics. It serves as a reminder that even minor details can impact public perception. The expectation for politicians to present themselves well continues, even as definitions of what constitutes "well-dressed" evolve over time.
**The Impact of Style on Public Image**
How attire impacts public image cannot be underestimated. For instance, Biden's choice to append a classic suit with sneakers played into the narrative of relatability, suggesting a leader who prioritizes comfort and practicality over formality. In a rapidly changing political environment where transparency and approachability are increasingly valued, these stylistic choices can enhance or detract from a politician's message.
On the flip side, the prevalence of high-end labels and luxurious fabric, as exhibited by those such as Trump and Musk, may evoke criticism among constituents who favor more modest symbolism of leadership. The emphasis on luxury can be polarizing, signaling either success and aspiration or elitism and disconnect.
**Looking Forward: The Evolution of Political Fashion**
As we move forward from this inauguration, it will be interesting to observe how the personal styles of leaders will continue to evolve in response to shifting societal expectations. Will the pressure to dress in a manner that is "presidential" or "suitable" maintain its grip, or will more casual and individual expressions gain further ground?
The boundaries of political attire are being tested, particularly as younger leaders emerge. A generation that has grown accustomed to digital communication and informal interaction may indeed have a different outlook on dress codes altogether, prioritizing personal branding over traditional signals of authority and formality.
**The Role of Tailoring in Modern Politics**
In conclusion, the inauguration painted a complex picture of masculinity, authority, and personal expression in political attire. There remains an undeniable strength in well-tailored garments that communicate professionalism and intent—something that Fetterman notably missed but could benefit from embracing. As the emphasis on individualism continues to rise, a return to thoughtful tailoring could enhance the professional image of those holding public office, offering a balanced blend of comfort and respectability in a fast-evolving landscape.
Ultimately, as we witness the intersection of fashion and politics, it becomes clear that what politicians wear serves as more than mere clothing; it is a form of communication that can influence public perception, inspire discussion, and potentially define a legacy. Whether through the resurgence of tailored sophistication or the embrace of more casual styles, the choices made on such significant occasions will undoubtedly resonate for years to come.
Camille Lefevre for TROIB News
While some attendees at the ceremony, including those at the preceding vice presidential dinner, appeared well-groomed, others, like Sen. John Fetterman, stood out for entirely different reasons.
While there's much to say about the vibrant women's fashion on display, I chose to focus solely on the men. Here are my thoughts as a menswear writer on the sartorial highs and lows of the occasion.
**Donald Trump’s Suit and Italian Influence**
Since George Washington donned a morning coat and intricate ruffles, it's been customary for U.S. presidents to wear American-made clothing for their inaugurations. Joe Biden, for instance, chose a full Ralph Lauren ensemble, with every piece crafted in New York at Hickey Freeman’s factory. Similarly, Barack Obama wore garments from Hart Schaffner Marx, all produced in Illinois.
As of now, the maker of Donald Trump’s inauguration outfit remains undisclosed. During his previous presidency, Trump favored suits from the Italian luxury brand Brioni, known for their sharply padded shoulders — a contrast to the softer lines typical of American fashion. Based on the suit's sharp silhouette, it appears that his choice today matches the essence of Brioni. While opinions often critique Trump’s penchant for oversized clothing, this particular cut is flattering, enhancing his V-shaped silhouette. Notably, he opted for a tie with a blue-and-red design, possibly signaling a desire for bipartisanship.
Despite the suit's Italian flair, I hope Trump chose an American manufacturer. The closing of American factories over recent years is concerning. Keeping with the tradition of wearing American-made attire would be a positive gesture for a sitting president, not just during inaugurations but throughout their administration.
**JD Vance’s Almost Perfect Look**
The vice presidential dinner showcased more of the administration's fashion sensibilities. JD Vance donned a single-breasted dinner suit, complete with black onyx dress studs and a bow tie, likely tailored by Romualdo Pelle, a seasoned Italian craftsman in Ohio. The fit was commendable, as the jacket complemented his physique without strain. However, the sleeves were a bit too narrow, causing them to ride up and expose too much shirt cuff, an issue that can easily be remedied by letting the arms hang relaxed when fitting a jacket. Notably, Vance wore formal pumps, a bold choice that, while less common nowadays, remains a classic and sophisticated option for black-tie events.
**Biden’s Sneakers Break the Classic Look**
In the past decade, Joe Biden has generally been well-dressed for a political figure, managing to sidestep many of the worse trends thanks to his age. He sticks to a classic silhouette that flatters his frame, avoiding the shrunken tailoring that has plagued many.
For Trump’s inauguration, Biden wore his standard navy suit paired with a dark tie and a white spread-collar shirt, complete with French cuffs, which added a touch of formality. However, his choice of black-soled dress sneakers, presumably for comfort, detracted from the overall elegance of the ensemble. A pair of leather-soled oxford shoes would have been more fitting.
**John Fetterman’s Casual Approach**
Despite icy temperatures in Washington, Fetterman arrived at the formal events wearing a black hoodie, basketball shorts, and rubber running shoes. This laid-back attire has often garnered more attention than his legislative work. It raises questions as to why Fetterman could wear a suit for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address, yet appeared so casually dressed for this significant occasion. In the new year, it might benefit him to invest in a well-fitting custom suit, preferably a dark worsted fabric.
**Ted Cruz and the Casual Watch Misstep**
Traditionally, men distinguished their wardrobes between casual and formal, a standard that seems to have faded. This was evident in Ted Cruz’s attire at the ceremony, where he opted for a navy suit, light blue shirt, and a chunky Hublot chronograph on a rubber strap. The watch, while expensive, clashed with the formality of the suit. A more understated timepiece would have enhanced the overall elegance of his look.
**Vivek Ramaswamy’s Outdated Fit**
Vivek Ramaswamy’s slim-fit suit struck a nostalgic note, reminiscent of early 2000s fashion. His trousers were tight to the point of discomfort, barely covering his rear. A suitable investment in quality tailoring would serve him well, ensuring he projects a more polished image.
**A Call for Tailoring Among Elites**
This year’s inauguration resembled the finalé of a sitcom, with various familiar figures from the celebrity world making appearances. Notable among them were MMA fighter Conor McGregor in a snug plum suit, which looked overly restrained. Joe Rogan’s somber ensemble echoed a funeral vibe, while influencers like the Paul brothers braved the cold in charcoal attire.
The tech sector's representation was particularly telling, with CEOs like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos in attendance. Musk’s choice of what appeared to be a Tom Ford suit was commendable compared to his previous looks, but the overall lack of well-tailored suits among these elites signifies a growing discomfort with traditional menswear in an era leaning towards casual styles.As the day unfolded, the fashion choices reflected not only individual styles but also the broader cultural attitudes among a new generation of leaders and influencers. The juxtaposition of familiar figures dressed in a mix of formal and casual attire pointed to a shifting landscape in American political and social spheres, where tradition competes with evolving norms of self-expression and comfort.
**Fashion Trends Mirroring Political Discourse**
The sartorial choices at the inauguration ceremony and associated events can also be seen as a reflection of contemporary political discourse. The casual attire worn by some figures symbolizes a break from established norms, presenting an image that is accessible and relatable to a base that values authenticity over tradition. In this context, Fetterman's laid-back approach resonates with a demographic that appreciates the unfiltered, while Cruz’s more conventional look could be seen as catering to a different voter segment that clings to established political fashion.
Moreover, the focus on tailoring—highlighted through Vance's almost flawless suit that was just slightly off in sleeve fit—underscores the importance of personal presentation in politics. It serves as a reminder that even minor details can impact public perception. The expectation for politicians to present themselves well continues, even as definitions of what constitutes "well-dressed" evolve over time.
**The Impact of Style on Public Image**
How attire impacts public image cannot be underestimated. For instance, Biden's choice to append a classic suit with sneakers played into the narrative of relatability, suggesting a leader who prioritizes comfort and practicality over formality. In a rapidly changing political environment where transparency and approachability are increasingly valued, these stylistic choices can enhance or detract from a politician's message.
On the flip side, the prevalence of high-end labels and luxurious fabric, as exhibited by those such as Trump and Musk, may evoke criticism among constituents who favor more modest symbolism of leadership. The emphasis on luxury can be polarizing, signaling either success and aspiration or elitism and disconnect.
**Looking Forward: The Evolution of Political Fashion**
As we move forward from this inauguration, it will be interesting to observe how the personal styles of leaders will continue to evolve in response to shifting societal expectations. Will the pressure to dress in a manner that is "presidential" or "suitable" maintain its grip, or will more casual and individual expressions gain further ground?
The boundaries of political attire are being tested, particularly as younger leaders emerge. A generation that has grown accustomed to digital communication and informal interaction may indeed have a different outlook on dress codes altogether, prioritizing personal branding over traditional signals of authority and formality.
**The Role of Tailoring in Modern Politics**
In conclusion, the inauguration painted a complex picture of masculinity, authority, and personal expression in political attire. There remains an undeniable strength in well-tailored garments that communicate professionalism and intent—something that Fetterman notably missed but could benefit from embracing. As the emphasis on individualism continues to rise, a return to thoughtful tailoring could enhance the professional image of those holding public office, offering a balanced blend of comfort and respectability in a fast-evolving landscape.
Ultimately, as we witness the intersection of fashion and politics, it becomes clear that what politicians wear serves as more than mere clothing; it is a form of communication that can influence public perception, inspire discussion, and potentially define a legacy. Whether through the resurgence of tailored sophistication or the embrace of more casual styles, the choices made on such significant occasions will undoubtedly resonate for years to come.
Camille Lefevre for TROIB News
